Correction to: Neutral and Cationic Hydridoruthenium Tetrakiscarbene Complexes (Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2010), 2010, 6, (918–925), 10.1002/ejic.200900708)

Wolf R., Plois M., Hepp A.

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

Incorrect 1H NMR data were reported for [RuCl2(IMe)4] (1) in the original manuscript. The correct values are as follows: 1H NMR (400 MHz, C6D6, 300 K): δ = 1.80 (s, 24 H, CCH3), 3.72 (s, 24 H, NCH3). We thank Prof. Deryn E. Fogg (University of Ottawa, Canada) for making us aware of this mistake. We further wish to comment on the NMR assignment reported for [RuH(IMe)4][BEt4] (3BEt4). As described in the original manuscript, this compound was isolated as a mixture with two minor products, which we tentatively identified as the putative THF adduct [RuH(IMe)4(thf)][BEt4] (3thf) and an unknown hydroborane species. We have now come to different conclusions regarding the nature of these minor products. A reassessment of the original data and reports by Whittlesey and co-workers, suggest that the minor components likely are the dihydride [RuH2(IMe)4] (2),, and the dihydrogen complex [Ru(H)(η2-H2)(IMe)4][BEt4] (4BEt4).[3]The assignment of the 1H NMR data should be corrected accordingly, the corrected assignment is given below. 1H NMR integration indicates that 2/3BEt4/4BEt4 are present in a 4:89:7 ratio at 220 K. Broadening of the hydride signals at δ = ‒40.0 and ‒9.00 ppm was observed at temperatures >220 K. This might be caused by intermolecular exchange between 3BEt4 and 4BEt4. 1H NMR Data for [RuH(IMe)4][BEt4] (3BEt4) and Minor Products: 1H NMR (400 MHz, [D8]THF, 300 K): δ = ‒39.9 (br., νFWHM = 400 Hz, 0.86 H, HRu of 3BEt4), ‒8.15 (s, νFWHM = 6.0 Hz, 0.06 H, H2Ru of 2), ‒4.04 (s, νFWHM = 11.0 Hz, 0.26 H, Ru–η2-H2 of 4BEt4), ‒0.17 (m, 8 H, JH-11B = 4.0 Hz, JH-10B = 1.3 Hz, JH-H = 7.8 Hz, BCH2CH3 of [BEt4]‒), 0.60 (m, 12 H, JH-11B = 2.9 Hz, JH-10B = 1.0 Hz, JH-H = 7.8 Hz, BCH2CH3 of [BEt4]‒), 1.96 (s, 0.7 H, CCH3 of 2; this signal partiallyoverlaps with the signal at δ = 2.04 ppm), 2.04 (s, 26 H, overlapping CCH3 signals of 3BEt4 and 4BEt3), 3.13 (s, 26 H, overlapping NCH3 signals of 3BEt4 and 4BEt3), 3.33 (s, 0.7 H, NCH3 of 2). 1H NMR (400 MHz, [D8]THF, 220 K): δ = ‒40.0 (br. s, νFWHM = 40 Hz, 0.86 H, HRu of 3BEt4), ‒8.99 (s, νFWHM = 9 Hz, 0.14 H, RuH of 4BEt3), ‒8.33 (s, νFWHM = 8 Hz, 0.05 H, H2Ru of 2), ‒4.20 (s, νFWHM = 31.1 Hz, 0.28 H, Ru–η2-H2 of 4BEt4), ‒0.23 (br., νFWHM = 21 Hz, 8 H, BCH2CH3), 0.56 (br., νFWHM = 18 Hz, 12 H, BCH2CH3), 1.96 (s, 0.6 H, CCH3 of 2), 2.04 (s, 26 H; overlapping CCH3 signals of 3BEt4 and 4BEt3), 3.03 (s, 2 H, NCH3 of 4BEt3), 3.13 (s, 24 H, NCH3 of 3BEt3), 3.30 (s, 0.6 H, NCH3 of 2).

Details about the publication

JournalEuropean Journal of Inorganic Chemistry
Volume2017
Issue40
Page range4814null
StatusPublished
Release year2017
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1002/ejic.201701166
Link to the full texthttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85033395247&origin=inward
KeywordsCarbene ligands; Hydrides; Ruthenium

Authors from the University of Münster

Hepp, Alexander
Professorship of Inorganic Chemistry (Prof. Hahn)
Plois, Markus
Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry
Wolf, Robert
Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry