Experimental and bioinformatic characterization of a recombinant polygalacturonase-inhibitor protein from pearl millet and its interaction with fungal polygalacturonases

Prabhu Sreedhara Ashok,Singh Ratna,Kolkenbrock Stephan, Sujeeth Neerakkal, El Gueddari Nour Eddine, Moerschbacher Bruno M., Kini Ramachandra, Wagenknecht Martin

Research article (journal) | Peer reviewed

Abstract

Polygalacturonases (PGs) are hydrolytic enzymes employed by several phytopathogens to weaken the plant cell wall by degrading homopolygalacturonan, a major constituent of pectin. Plants fight back by employing polygalacturonase-inhibitor proteins (PGIPs). The present study compared the inhibition potential of pearl millet PGIP (Pennisetum glaucum; PglPGIP1) with the known inhibition of Phaseolus vulgaris PGIP (PvPGIP2) against two PGs, the PG-II isoform from Aspergillus niger (AnPGII) and the PG-III isoform from Fusarium moniliforme (FmPGIII). The key rationale was to elucidate the relationship between the extent of sequence similarity of the PGIPs and the corresponding PG inhibition potential. First, a pearl millet pgip gene (Pglpgip1) was isolated and phylogenetically placed among monocot PGIPs alongside foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Upstream sequence analysis of Pglpgip1 identified important cis-elements responsive to light, plant stress hormones, and anoxic stress. PglPGIP1, heterologously produced in Escherichia coli, partially inhibited AnPGII non-competitively with a pH optimum between 4.0 and 4.5, and showed no inhibition against FmPGIII. Docking analysis showed that the concave surface of PglPGIP1 interacted strongly with the N-terminal region of AnPGII away from the active site, whereas it weakly interacted with the C-terminus of FmPGIII. Interestingly, PglPGIP1 and PvPGIP2 employed similar motif regions with few identical amino acids for interaction with AnPGII at non-substrate-binding sites; however, they engaged different regions of AnPGII. Computational mutagenesis predicted D126 (PglPGIP1)-K39 (AnPGII) to be the most significant binding contact in the PglPGIP1-AnPGII complex. Such protein-protein interaction studies are crucial in the future generation of designer host proteins for improved resistance against everevolving pathogen virulence factors. © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Experimental Biology.

Details about the publication

JournalJournal of Experimental Botany
Volume65
Issue17
Page range5033-5047
StatusPublished
Release year2014 (01/01/2014)
Language in which the publication is writtenEnglish
DOI10.1093/jxb/eru266

Authors from the University of Münster

El Gueddari, Nour-Eddine
Molecular Phytopathology and Renewable Resources - Group Prof. Bruno Moerschbacher
Kolkenbrock, Stephan
Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology
Moerschbacher, Bruno
Molecular Phytopathology and Renewable Resources - Group Prof. Bruno Moerschbacher
Singh, Ratna
Molecular Phytopathology and Renewable Resources - Group Prof. Bruno Moerschbacher
Wagenknecht, Martin
Institute of Plant Biology and Biotechnology